1) What was the biggest
surprise for you in the reading? In other words, what did you read that stood
out the most as different from your expectations?
I found this whole
chapter very interesting; I was surprised that the author was able to go
through the phases of creativity so thoroughly. This was interesting, as well as extremely useful.
I feel that by studying these phases, I can approach thinking of ideas in these
ways and have a better creative flow. With the phases, I can determine my
weaknesses in creatively thinking, address them, and generate great ideas. The
author even gave suggestions to practice each phase.
2) Identify at least
one part of the reading that was confusing to you.
The part of the reading
that I found a little confusing was the sectioned titled “Eliminating Muddling
Mind-Sets”. As I was reading through it, I kept getting lost with what the
author was explaining. I found myself having to go back to understand what
habits he was talking about. After reading it a few times, I understood it.
3) If you were able to
ask two questions to the author, what would you ask? Why?
How were you able to
identify the innovative ideas? It was very difficult for me to think about
where innovative ideas can be brought up from, so I am shocked at the authors
ability to identify them so well. I like that he put his sources to help answer
my question a little.
Would you consider the
functional perspective to be selfish, or just human nature? When I first read
it, I thought selfish. But as I went back to understand the meaning of the
perspective better, it almost seemed like it was just the reality of things and
not selfish at all. I’m interested in knowing the author’s perspective.
4) Was there anything
you think the author was wrong about? Where do you disagree with what she or he
said? How?
I didn’t think the
author was wrong about anything. It’s very hard to disagree with a textbook
since everything is backed up with facts and sources. The author doesn’t
include opinions and is very thorough in his explanations.
No comments:
Post a Comment